Reviews and features
Read the following review and feature on Capital:
Guardian review by Sam Wollaston
London Evening Standard: five things you need to know about Capital
1) What positive points does the review pick out about Capital? What criticisms are made - either of the TV drama or the original novel?
- The way that Peter Bowker and Euros Lyn adapted to and directed Capital excellently, especially due to the way they managed to squeeze so much into just one street, one book ad three hours of television without overwhelmingly positive or negative portrays
- The way that seemingly 'terrible' characters still evoke sympathy from the audience due to the good writing of the show
- The writer of the article familiarises the street that Capital was shot on with the street that they live on- these similarities in setting suggests that the representation of London in Capital is realistic and authentic
- There was also a positive point made about the cast that appeals to many age ranges, all types of audiences may recognise at least one actor in this show
- The way that Capital has incorporated real issues in London, such as the economy and other financial issues, has increased how relatable the show is to an audience from London because they can relate and see themselves with these issues
- A criticism of Capital was made regarding the lack of coverage over every aspect of London- but I believe that this is an unfair criticism because the show is only three hours long so it is unrealistic to expect them to be able to cover every single aspect of London life in this time
2) What references can you find in the reviews and feature to the idea Capital is a 'state-of-the-nation' drama? How does it capture modern-day London?
This review states the idea of Capital being a 'state-of-the-nation' drama due to the similarities that can be identified in the rising house prices and the local shops that we, as an audience, may recognise in our own environment. It also captures modern-day London/Britain because it accurately and realistically depicts the variety of lives that are lived in a capitalist society- whether that is the financially-sound or economically-struggling. There is also a sense of jealously that has been portrayed through the postcards that read "WE WANT WHAT YOU HAVE" where we are led to believe that the economically-struggling are envious of the financially-sound because they have what the economically-struggling desire and find impossible to acquire
Trailer analysis
- White-British people don't have a full understanding of foreign people- Petunia assumes the cashier is Indian and he corrects her
- The montage shows how London has changed over time
- Drone shot of London captures the scale and power that the city holds
- "Usman isn't going anywhere, he gets vertigo going North of the river"- feels authentic and shows that immigrants are not outsiders because they are fully integrated into London life
- There is a skip visible during the funeral scene to execute how people and society and culture changed in London as time goes on
- They all have stereotypical jobs
- Roger and Lothar clearly have no idea what Mark (younger man) is talking about- nod to the 2007 financial crisis and lack of oversight in the banking industry
- "No need to go too heavy on the terminology Mark"- older generation dismissive of younger generation
- Offices are overwhelmingly white, male and middle-upper class- lack of representation of different genders, ethnicity, race, class, etc
- Drone shot of London area which feels authentic- shows the financial district which emphasises power and wealth as well as the importance of finance
- "You'd be surprised how little a million pounds covers these days"- wealth and money divide
- Reference to German boss and cultural stereotypes
- Arabella and Roger's relationship is conditional and is based on how much money Roger earns
- The sound (background noise, loud music, baby crying, chatter, etc) emphasises the difficulty of living with other people
- Quentina's narrative highlights sharp contrast with Roger's life (power/dominance of financial district)
- "Perhaps a little kiss?"- emphasises power and patriarchy
- Black female lawyer- subverts traditional stereotypes (left-wing ideologies)
- Quentina is being exploited (paid £200 for £300 worth of work)- people trafficking/criminal exploitation of Quentina as she is "not permitted to work"
- "What use is 30 grand to anybody?"- highlights the contrast between the Kumar family or Quentina (whose lives would be changed by £30k) and emphasises the wealth inequality
- Technical construction- cross cutting of his reaction and time lapse to show his state of mind
- Arabella and corriander- proof that she has never even been in her local corner shop which reflects the idea that the upper-class are detached from their own community
- Kamal family dinner- close-knit and warm family despite harmless disagreements
- Positive representation of family life and working-class life
- Arabella shocked by warmth and generosity
- Apple Tree Yard
- Broadchurch S3: Winner of Best Drama Series at the TV Choice Awards and Best Crime Drama 2017 at the National Television Awards 2018
- Tin Star
- Troy
- Humans S2
- The Tunnel
- Vengeance
- The Boy With The Topknot
- Man in an Orange Shirt
- Grantchester S3
- Entertainment: action scenes in the showreel that are sure to excite an audience
- Personal Identity: representation of different races, ethnicity, and sexuality
- Personal Relationships: audience gets to know recurring characters part of the ensemble cast
- Surveillance: some dramas looked into historical meanings
- Charlotte Moore: Controller of BBC One
- Ben Stephenson: Controller of BBC Drama
- Derex Wax (the Executive Producer for Kudos) says he produced Capital because "the novel really spoke to me as it has a sweeping Dickensian ambition to it, all life in one street. I loved the sense of this big, expansive panorama of life as well as the small details of human behaviour. The whole of London seen through the microcosm of one street. And the characters are so complex, real and believable. Sometimes big ‘state of the nation’ novels use characters to illustrate political points, but Capital is far more subtle and nuanced. John gets inside their heads and allows us to engage with their thoughts and feelings, observes them with insight, humour and humanity, allows the story to breathe"
- Derex Wax also says that Capital "definitely speaks to me about where London and the country is now. The obsession with property, the fact that London house prices have risen extraordinarily, has only intensified the sense of a society of haves and have-nots. Your home becomes the thing by which you are defined at some level, and in Capital we go from Bogdan's bedsit to Petunia's home untouched for 60 years, to Roger and Arabella with their multiple homes and constant refurbishment, which is a fascinating way of entering the psychology of these characters. Everyone’s connection to money is explored but then the novel expands to ask what life’s real value is, and it does this with a very deft, light touch. I’d say the novel is profound but never overtly polemical"